Although the Mexican state had previously established laws regarding the regulation of legal prositution in largely urban settings, the Mexican Revolution produced widespread violence and displacement which encouraged migration to urban centers exacerbating the number of women whom utilized sex work as a means of establishing economic security for themselves and their dependents. Often times it was long established norms and not exceptional wartime conditions, such as the practice of sending young women to urban centers to work as domestic servants, which exposed women to the dangers of being sexually assaulted, debased, and subsequently abandonded by their families for exhibiting sexual experience. Without economic security and with a minimal education and a limited skillset, many women turned to sex work in brothels, cabarets, dance halls, and hotels. In these emerging spaces, women forged new communities and families with other women whom experience similar socioeconomic conditions and create networks of solidarity. These women consistently combatted the assertions made by the state and physicians concerning the “anti-nationalistic and unrevolutionary” nature of their work by asserting that the sex work women were engaging in was vital to the nation since they weren’t simply sex workers but mothers and daughters whom put “them(selves) at risk of abuse, violence, and disease to protect their children, Mexico’s future workers, and leaders” (Bliss, p.167).
By contrast, the piece concerning Amelio Robles’ transition and subsequent life demonstrates how the Mexican Revolution allowed for individuals to create new identities for themselves in the chaotic fires of revolution. Born a cis-gendered women and previously Emilia, Emilio Robles was able to successfully transition in the eye of the wider public through because Emilio performance of 19th century Mexican masculinity “exaggerated the masculine values exalted by the civil war” (Cano, p.45). The area where Emilio seemed to find people intent on “revealing” his past identity as a ciswoman seemed largely relegated to his hometown, though Cano describes well the ways in which Gertrude Derby projected her own expectations and desires of revplutionary processes and what they meant for cis women onto Robles’ experiences as a transgendered male. Despite the revolutionary period producing opportunities for Emilio Robles to come into his identity as a man, expressions of gender or sexuality which did not reenforce predominant understandings of masculinity or feminity found more difficulty in finding acceptance, as was the case for Manuel Palafox, one of the main intellectuals of Zapatismo whom was dismissed as “a poor devil of the wrong sex” incapable of “be(ing) called a friend to those of us who are real men” due to his homosexuality (Cano, p. 45).